ArticleThe Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management2025
Brugadaphobia.
Article in The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter from the Editor in Chief.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the case of a young man with cocaine intoxication whose electrocardiogram (ECG) on presentation showed a typical type 1 Brugada pattern. The patient had no personal or family history of unexplained syncope or sudden cardiac death. The ECG quickly normalized, and follow-up ECGs continued to be normal. Nevertheless, the patient and family members insisted on implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator. The purpose of this case report is to discuss the somewhat unfounded fear of sudden cardiac death of asymptomatic patients with Brugada-type ECGs that has been termed "brugadaphobia" and to highlight the difficult and controversial decision-making process that should include discussions about the possible benefits and harms of an overly active diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.