Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41078504›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Spectral detector computed tomography imaging of histologically confirmed splenic pathologies in 30 canine patients: a comparison of virtual non-contrast images and true unenhanced images.

Alkje M van Gemmeren, Lydia K Claußen, Philipp Lietz, Sebastian Meller, Adriano Wang-Leandro, Andreas Beineke, Verena Nerschbach, Holger A Volk, Kristina Merhof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alkje M van GemmerenDepartment of Small Animal Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Lydia K ClaußenDepartment of Small Animal Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Philipp LietzDepartment of Small Animal Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Sebastian MellerDepartment of Small Animal Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Adriano Wang-LeandroDepartment of Small Animal Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Andreas BeinekeInstitute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Verena NerschbachDepartment of Small Animal Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Holger A VolkDepartment of Small Animal Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Kristina MerhofDepartment of Small Animal Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT), a cutting-edge technique in veterinary medicine, offers various options for characterizing soft tissues. One such option is the virtual non-contrast (VNC) algorithm, which reconstructs pre-contrast images from post-contrast spectral data by identifying and subtracting iodine pixels. This method has demonstrated accuracy in assessing abdominal organs in healthy canine patients. To determine whether this algorithm can be applied in a clinical setting to reduce radiation dose, scan time, and, consequently, the duration of general anesthesia, its accuracy in patients with pathology must be evaluated. Methods: Our study compared the Hounsfield units (HUs) measured in VNC and true unenhanced (TUE) images for splenic pathologies in general, as well as for specific types of pathologies based on their imaging characteristics. All differences were determined through subtraction and evaluated by using cut-off values of ≤ 5, ≤ 10, and ≤ 15 HUs. Differences in HUs of ≤ 10 were deemed negligible, while differences ≤ 15 HUs were considered acceptable. Two one-sided t-tests were performed. Additionally, image quality and iodine subtraction were evaluated using a five-point Likert scale. Results: For splenic pathologies in general, lesions classified by imaging characteristics and various pathologies, the VNC technique demonstrated high efficiency in contrast medium subtraction and exhibited a strong agreement with TUE images regarding their HUs. In 305 drawn regions of interest (ROIs), the differences in HUs between TUE and VNC were ≤ 15 HUs in 98.0%, ≤ 10 HUs in 93.1%, and at least 66.2% were below the limit of 5 HUs. SDCT images provided better image quality than conventional computed tomography images. Discussion: Our study suggests that VNC images reconstructed from post-contrast SDCT data may serve as a promising alternative to the standard use of a pre- and post-contrast series. The VNC images provide high quality and reliability in imaging structurally altered splenic tissue, but show a potential weakness in the calculation of some mineralized lesions.

Indexed as

dual-energyspectral detector computed tomographysplenopathytrue unenhanced imagesvirtual-non-contrast technique

Identifiers

PMID41078504
PMCPMC12511805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.