ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Spectral detector computed tomography imaging of histologically confirmed splenic pathologies in 30 canine patients: a comparison of virtual non-contrast images and true unenhanced images.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Virtual Non-Contrast Images Generated by Spectral Detector Computed Tomography and Conventional Computed Tomography Images of Histologically Confirmed Hepatic Pathologies in 28 Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT), a cutting-edge technique in veterinary medicine, offers various options for characterizing soft tissues. One such option is the virtual non-contrast (VNC) algorithm, which reconstructs pre-contrast images from post-contrast spectral data by identifying and subtracting iodine pixels. This method has demonstrated accuracy in assessing abdominal organs in healthy canine patients. To determine whether this algorithm can be applied in a clinical setting to reduce radiation dose, scan time, and, consequently, the duration of general anesthesia, its accuracy in patients with pathology must be evaluated. Methods: Our study compared the Hounsfield units (HUs) measured in VNC and true unenhanced (TUE) images for splenic pathologies in general, as well as for specific types of pathologies based on their imaging characteristics. All differences were determined through subtraction and evaluated by using cut-off values of ≤ 5, ≤ 10, and ≤ 15 HUs. Differences in HUs of ≤ 10 were deemed negligible, while differences ≤ 15 HUs were considered acceptable. Two one-sided t-tests were performed. Additionally, image quality and iodine subtraction were evaluated using a five-point Likert scale. Results: For splenic pathologies in general, lesions classified by imaging characteristics and various pathologies, the VNC technique demonstrated high efficiency in contrast medium subtraction and exhibited a strong agreement with TUE images regarding their HUs. In 305 drawn regions of interest (ROIs), the differences in HUs between TUE and VNC were ≤ 15 HUs in 98.0%, ≤ 10 HUs in 93.1%, and at least 66.2% were below the limit of 5 HUs. SDCT images provided better image quality than conventional computed tomography images. Discussion: Our study suggests that VNC images reconstructed from post-contrast SDCT data may serve as a promising alternative to the standard use of a pre- and post-contrast series. The VNC images provide high quality and reliability in imaging structurally altered splenic tissue, but show a potential weakness in the calculation of some mineralized lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.