Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41078493›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Canine decontamination, a laboratory study evaluating proper techniques to remove toxic materials from working dogs.

Brian France, Thomas A Malloy, Robert G Buntz, Kelly A Mann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. An evaluation of a canine dry wipe decontamination kit.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian FranceTDA Research, Inc., Golden, CO, United States.
Thomas A MalloyBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH, United States.
Robert G BuntzMantel Technologies, Inc., Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Kelly A MannMantel Technologies, Inc., Fort Collins, CO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Working dogs can inadvertently encounter toxic chemicals while performing their key activities. These can include toxic industrial chemicals and materials (TICs/TIMs), pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs, sewage, pesticides, and even highly toxic chemical warfare agents. All these materials can poison the canine, be spread by touch, and can be transferred to the handler, vehicle, or veterinary medical staff. A successful decontamination technique must be safe for the handler to perform, can be performed at the site of contamination, successfully removes the hazardous material before it poisons the canine or transfers to other surfaces, and does not lead to a large hazardous waste disposal event. Materials: Canine cadaver tissue samples (intact skin/fur) were used to conduct a decontamination comparison between dry, waterless, wipe decontamination and traditional soap and water wash decontamination. The chemical warfare agents sulfur mustard (HD) and venomous agent X (VX) were used for all testing. Results: The dry, waterless, wipe decontamination removed more chemical toxin (HD and VX) from canine fur, preventing transfer to the skin. The soap and water wash decontamination provided a route of transfer for toxins to reach the canine skin. Discussion: To successfully decontaminate a working dog after toxic chemical exposure to HD and VX, dry, waterless, wipe decontamination should be performed to remove the majority of the toxin. This procedure reduces the transfer hazard to the handler, vehicle and veterinary medical staff which can then perform further decontamination and medical intervention.

Indexed as

caninechemical warfare agentdecontaminationmilitary working dogmulti-purpose caninesulfur mustardvenomous agent X

Identifiers

PMID41078493
PMCPMC12511782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.