Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41078476›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025

Facet joint loading after Kevlar-reinforced disc replacement vs. lumbar fusion. A cadaveric model study.

Amparo Vanaclocha, Vicente Vanaclocha, Carlos Atienza, Pablo Jorda-Gomez, Andres Peñuelas, David Gomez-Lopez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amparo VanaclochaInstituto de Biomecánica (IBV), Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Vicente VanaclochaUniversity of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Carlos AtienzaInstituto de Biomecánica (IBV), Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Pablo Jorda-GomezHospital General Universitario de Castellon, Castellon de la Plana, Spain.
Andres PeñuelasInstituto de Biomecánica (IBV), Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
David Gomez-LopezInstituto de Biomecánica (IBV), Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spinal fusion, while effective for degenerative disc disease, eliminates motion and may accelerate adjacent segment degeneration. Total disc replacement (TDR) with anterior annular reinforcement may offer a motion-preserving alternative. Objective: To compare spinal kinematics and facet joint pressures between (1) total lumbar disc replacement with anterior Kevlar band reinforcement (TDR group) and (2) standard 360° lumbar fusion (fusion group) in a cadaveric model. Methods: Six fresh-frozen human lumbar spines (L2-S1) were tested in a custom motion simulator under both surgical conditions at L4-L5. Kinematic parameters included range of motion (ROM), peak angles, and motion harmony (angle-acceleration correlation). Zygapophyseal joint pressures were measured using Tekscan sensors. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: The TDR group preserved significantly greater flexion (-25.7° vs -21.8°, Conclusion: Anterior annular reconstruction with Kevlar bands during total disc replacement restores near-physiological motion and improves kinematic control without increasing facet joint stress. This technique may offer a biomechanically favorable alternative to lumbar fusion.

Indexed as

Cadaveric spine biomechanicsFacet joint loadingKevlar ligament augmentationLumbar disc arthroplastyLumbar spinal fusionSpinal kinematicsTotal disc replacementZygapophyseal joint pressure

Identifiers

PMID41078476
PMCPMC12508821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.