ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Comparative analysis of deep learning models for early detection of osteoarthritis using knee radiographs: A retrospective study.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Advances in deep learning multimodal fusion for early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Review
- Cross-Institutional Five-Class Kellgren-Lawrence Grading of Knee Osteoarthritis via Multitask Deep Learning.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent degenerative joint disease leading to pain and disability worldwide. Early detection is critical to initiating treatment strategies that can delay disease progression. While deep learning models have shown promise in automating Osteoarthritis detection from radiographs, comparative studies assessing their efficacy for early-stage detection remain limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of three deep learning architectures for early detection of knee osteoarthritis using radiographic imaging. Materials and methods: A retrospective study analysing 1200 knee radiographs (1000 training, 200 validation) collected from 2022 to 2024. Three deep learning models (custom CNN, ResNet-50, and VGG-16) were implemented and trained using PyTorch. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC metrics. Ground truth was established through independent assessment by three experienced orthopaedic surgeons using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system. Results: ResNet-50 demonstrated superior performance with accuracy 0.912 ± 0.018, sensitivity 0.908 ± 0.021, specificity 0.916 ± 0.017, and AUC 0.934 ± 0.013. VGG-16 followed with accuracy 0.887 ± 0.020, while the custom CNN achieved 0.853 ± 0.025. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences between models (p < 0.01). Inter-observer agreement (kappa = 0.83 ± 0.02) indicated strong concordance between AI predictions and expert assessments. Model performance remained consistent across demographic subgroups, with only minimal variations based on age and BMI. Conclusion: ResNet-50 architecture demonstrated optimal performance for early osteoarthritis detection, combining high accuracy with clinically viable processing speeds. The model's consistency across demographic subgroups and strong inter-observer agreement suggests potential for reliable clinical implementation in automated screening workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.