ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
The Efficacy of Evidence-Based Nursing Interventions in Postoperative Care for Cervical Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nurse-led interventions for cervical cancer patients: A scoping review with an emphasis on East Asian contexts.Belitung nursing journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer patients often face complex physical and psychological challenges following surgery. Evidence-based nursing (EBN) interventions, tailored to meet these needs, may enhance postoperative recovery, but their specific effects on patient outcomes in cervical cancer care have been less explored. This study evaluates the impact of EBN on awareness, psychological well-being, quality of life (QoL), and nursing satisfaction in postoperative care for cervical cancer patients. Methods: This retrospective study (January 2021-December 2023) included adult cervical cancer patients undergoing primary surgery, divided into a control group (n=80, standard care) and an observation group (n=76, EBN interventions). Outcomes were disease/surgery awareness, treatment knowledge, and intraoperative cooperation (100-point scales); psychological distress using the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R); QoL using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30); perioperative patient satisfaction (100-point questionnaire). Results: The observation group demonstrated significantly higher scores in cervical cancer awareness (95.82 ± 5.34 vs 84.38 ± 5.21, p < 0.001), surgical knowledge (96.26 ± 7.12 vs 88.03 ± 6.43, p < 0.001), and cooperation (92.13 ± 8.15 vs 82.10 ± 7.82, p < 0.001). Post-intervention reductions in anxiety, depression, and other emotional symptoms were significantly greater in the observation group (p < 0.05). QoL scores improved across all functional domains, especially physiological (86.66 ± 13.05 vs 64.85 ± 9.80, p < 0.001). Total nursing satisfaction was higher in the observation group (96.05% vs 83.75%, χ² = 6.409, p = 0.011). Conclusion: EBN interventions in postoperative care for cervical cancer patients might be associated with notable benefits, including enhanced patient awareness, improved psychological well-being, better QoL, and higher nursing satisfaction. These findings suggest that EBN could be a valuable approach for improving outcomes in postoperative cervical cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.