ArticleHand therapy2026
Efficacy of a new flossing intervention using a floss band for severe adhesion after digit tendon repair.
Article in Hand therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tendon adhesions after hand surgery can severely impair motion and function. Although early mobilization is preferred, re-ruptures or complex trauma cases often require immobilization, increasing the risk of adhesion. Purpose: This report presents two cases-one involving flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon re-rupture and another with multiple extensor tendon injuries-treated with a novel flossing intervention aimed at improving tendon gliding and soft tissue flexibility. Methods: In both cases, flossing therapy using a rubber compression band was introduced at 8 weeks postoperatively, following standard immobilization and rehabilitation protocols. Patients performed flossing exercises daily under supervised and home-based conditions. Results: The FPL case showed an improvement in %TAM from 20.8% to 83.3%, and the extensor tendon case improved from 42.9%-50% to 96.4%-98.4% over 16 weeks. Both patients regained functional range of motion and returned to work without requiring tenolysis. Importantly, these improvements occurred when flossing was paired with active range of motion (AROM) exercises, rather than by flossing alone. Conclusions: Flossing, particularly when combined with active range of motion (AROM) exercises, may be a useful adjunct to conventional therapy for managing severe adhesions after tendon repair. These case reports suggest that improvements were likely achieved through the combined effect of flossing and conventional active exercises, rather than flossing alone. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal parameters and generalizability of this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.