ArticleMolecular ecology2025
Habitat Differences in Resource Density and Distribution Affect Ecology and Life History of a Landscape-Modifying Fish.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resource heterogeneity is a widespread phenomenon, as resources are rarely spaced evenly across a landscape. Variation in resource density and distribution can have a myriad of behavioural, ecological, and evolutionary consequences for populations, yet clarifying these effects is still challenging. We combine both novel and previously published data on genetic parentage, relatedness, life history, and predation to present a comprehensive field study of a shell bed in Lake Tanganyika. Here, a wild population of the cichlid fish Neolamprologus multifasciatus is naturally subdivided into habitat regions that differ immensely in shelter density and distribution, as well as in the capacity for the fish to physically rearrange their shelters into clusters (i.e., engage in niche construction). Shelters were evenly, densely, and continuously spaced in one habitat, while they were highly clustered in the other habitat. We expected the environmental potential for polygyny to be greater in the clustered habitat relative to the continuous habitat. Predation regimes and life history traits differed, with N. multifasciatus in the evenly distributed habitat experiencing higher predation threats, earlier maturation, and slower growth than those in the clustered habitat. Metrics of selection, however, were surprisingly consistent between the two habitats, as were patterns of dispersal. Overall, our research leverages the natural subdivision of a wild population into distinct habitats to investigate the ecological and evolutionary implications of resource heterogeneity and habitat modification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.