ReviewScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2025
Rethinking Acute Sports Injuries: Evidence for an Overuse Mechanism in Hamstring and ACL Injuries.
Review in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards High-Accuracy Athletic Injury Predictions Using a First-Principles Modelling Approach: Theory to (Future) Practice.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Rethinking Acute Sports Injuries: Evidence for an Overuse Mechanism in Hamstring and ACL Injuries.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sports injuries have traditionally been classified as acute or overuse based on their onset and associated circumstances. Hamstring strain injuries and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are two common sports injuries that are typically implicitly considered to represent acute injuries. This brief review, however, argues that hamstring and ACL injuries may at least partly present as overuse injuries resulting from a mechanical fatigue phenomenon, rather than acute injuries. Human, animal, and cadaveric studies are discussed to support this view. For example, human studies show no kinematic deviation in the stride during which the hamstring injury occurs as compared to the preceding strides. Further, the location of injury and ultrastructural damage of hamstring injuries is largely comparable to that seen in repetitive muscle-tendon unit lengthening experiments in animals. For the ACL, repetitive simulated jump landings have been shown to lead to ACL failure despite the ACL load being well below its ultimate strength. Furthermore, analyses of ACL explants obtained from noncontact ACL-injured patients during reconstruction surgery indicate similar damage to cadaveric studies that repetitively loaded the ACL. In summary, studies with diverse methodological approaches support the view that mechanical fatigue may predispose hamstring and ACL tissues to failure at submaximal loads during seemingly normal movements. Although further research is needed to substantiate these hypotheses, recognizing mechanical fatigue as a factor in these injuries can inform training and rehabilitation protocols and open opportunities to use modeling approaches and wearable sensors to monitor tissue load and damage, ultimately reducing injury rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.