Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41078177›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Optimizing Intervention Components of a Preventive Stress Management mHealth Intervention for Health Care Workers: Experimental Factorial Study.

Leo Kowalski, Anna Finnes, Sabine Koch, Aleksandra Bujacz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leo KowalskiHealth Informatics Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, Stockholm, 171 65, Sweden, 46 706758656.ORCID 0009-0000-3531-3486
Anna FinnesDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5615-4266
Sabine KochHealth Informatics Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, Stockholm, 171 65, Sweden, 46 706758656.ORCID 0000-0001-7144-8740
Aleksandra BujaczHealth Informatics Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, Stockholm, 171 65, Sweden, 46 706758656.ORCID 0000-0002-6968-6157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Work stress is a prevalent risk factor for mental health problems, such as burnout and depression. Health care workers, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, face high levels of work stress that make them a vulnerable population in need of support. Digital interventions are a promising way to combat this issue, offering the possibility of scalable programs that are easily accessible. While a wide range of stress management techniques can be incorporated into digital interventions, applying the multiphase optimization strategy enables systematic evaluation of what specific content most contributes to preventing the negative effects of work stress. Objective: The primary aim of this research was to identify which digital intervention components and combinations of components are most effective at preventing symptoms of stress-related health problems. These insights are valuable to inform future intervention development for optimizing intervention design. Methods: This study tested 5 digital intervention components aimed at improving stress management among workers. Engagement and Demands components allow participants to self-reflect on their work engagement and work challenges, while the Control component aids a more action-oriented process considering job crafting and detachment strategies. The Journaling component encourages a deeper reflection, and the Psychoeducation component provides evidence-based strategies for managing stress. In an experimental factorial study, Swedish health care workers (n=297) tested different versions of the intervention containing all possible combinations of these 5 components. Stress-related health outcomes, such as burnout, anxiety, and depression, were measured using questionnaires immediately before, immediately after, and 1 month after the end of the intervention. Results: The most promising intervention effects were observed when the Demands and Control components were present together in the intervention. Including these components led to an increase in social support (β=0.68; P<.001) and job crafting (β=0.41; P=.06) during the intervention, as well as a decrease in symptoms of emotional exhaustion (β=-0.50; P=.005), burnout (β=-0.54; P=.004), and anxiety (β=-0.44; P=.04) after the intervention. Notably, including one of the components without the other made outcomes worse than including neither of these 2 components. Furthermore, mindfulness after the intervention increased when both the Engagement and Demands components (β=0.72; P=.001) were included as well as when the Journaling and Psychoeducation components were included (β=0.46; P=.04). Conclusions: Results indicate that components aiding self-insight should be integrated with components providing actionable advice to achieve optimal intervention effects. Results from this optimization study may inform the development of preventive digital stress management interventions to be tested in future randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelOccupational StressTelemedicineAdultBurnout, ProfessionalDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2digital behavior change interventionfactorial experimental designformative assessmentmental healthmHealthmultiphase optimization strategystress managementwork stress

Identifiers

PMID41078177
PMCPMC12377794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.