ReviewInflammatory bowel diseases2025
IBD Prediction Is Possible, but How Far Are We from Implementing It?
Review in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current approaches to disease severity and therapy effectiveness assessment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Flos sophorae immaturus exosome-like nanovesicles alleviate ulcerative colitis by attenuating intestinal oxidative stress and inflammation through activating Aryl hydrocarbon receptor via gut microbiota and tryptophan metabolism regulation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- The 3 Ps of IBD today - prevention, pre-diagnosis and participation.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, collectively known as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), are chronic gastrointestinal diseases with poorly characterized pathophysiology. Recent advancements in the identification of preclinical biomarkers of IBD have shed some insight into our ability to predict or prevent these conditions. This review discusses the growing body of research on biomarkers ranging from genetics, measures of gut permeability, and microbiome signatures to circulating proteomics and metabolomics. In addition, the review will highlight the potential application of these biomarkers for early detection and risk stratification of IBD. Notably, proteomic markers such as CXCL9 and MMP-10, along with metabolic perturbations detectable prior to clinical diagnosis, provide promising avenues for understanding IBD pathogenesis and guiding prevention strategies. Furthermore, the development of integrative risk scores, combining multiomic data with demographic and lifestyle factors, could offer a personalized approach to disease prediction and prevention. While these advances present significant opportunities, challenges remain in data complexity and variability of biomarkers. This review emphasizes the importance of continued longitudinal studies and clinical trials to validate predictive models. Ultimately, the integration of early risk prediction holds the potential to reduce IBD incidence through targeted, proactive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.