Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41078128›Full record

ArticleJournal of viral hepatitis2025

Performance Evaluation of the Elecsys HCV Duo Immunoassay in the Public Healthcare Setting in Cape Town, South Africa.

Diana R Hardie, Stephen N J Korsman, Ziyaad Valley-Omar, Nadia Petersen, Russell Cable, C Wendy Spearman, Mark Sonderup

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diana R HardieDivision of Medical Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town Medical School, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0056-7547
Stephen N J KorsmanDivision of Medical Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town Medical School, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ziyaad Valley-OmarDivision of Medical Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town Medical School, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4804-3774
Nadia PetersenWestern Cape Blood Services, Cape Town, South Africa.
Russell CableWestern Cape Blood Services, Cape Town, South Africa.
C Wendy SpearmanDivision of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town Medical School and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Mark SonderupDivision of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town Medical School and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved HCV diagnosis and linkage to care is crucial to achieve WHO 2030 elimination targets. Simplification of diagnostics remains key. We evaluated the performance of Elecsys HCV Duo antigen/antibody immunoassay in patients using public healthcare in Cape Town, South Africa. 253 HCV seropositive and 214 seronegative samples were tested, and results correlated with standard-of-care (SOC) serology, HCV RNA, viral genotype, patient demographics, and disease markers. Thirteen patients on antiviral therapy were also evaluated. Elecsys HCV Duo antibody was equivalent to SOC serology, while antigen had 100% negative percent agreement in non-viraemic samples. One incident infection with viral load (VL) of 54,000 IU/mL was antigen positive/antibody negative. Overall, antigen detection was 63.2% in RNA-positive samples. VL strongly predicted reactivity, with antigen positive rates of 17.5% (< 5 log IU/mL), 75.8% (5-6 log IU/mL), 89.4% (6-7 log IU/mL), and 100% (> 7 log IU/mL). Detection in genotype-1 infections was significantly better, at 69.6% (95% CI 59.5-79.7) than non-genotype-1 at 43.2% (95% CI 28.7-57.7). In treated patients, antigen mirrored RNA clearance but was only reliable if positive at baseline. Elecsys HCV Duo detected active infection in 63% of viraemic patients, 70% with genotype 1. In our cohort, 49% of new patients would require VL testing.

Indexed as

HepacivirusHepatitis CHepatitis C AntibodiesHepatitis C AntigensAdultAgedFemaleGenotypeHumansImmunoassayMaleMiddle AgedRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificitySouth AfricaViral LoadHepatitis C AntibodiesHepatitis C AntigensRNA, Viralcore antigenElecsys HCV DuogenotypeHCV antibodyHCV viral loadhepatitis C virusimmunoassayserology

Identifiers

PMID41078128
PMCPMC12516464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.