SynthesisStroke2026
Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the extended time window: an updated meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Tenecteplase With or Without Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke at 4.5 to 24 h: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis with Tenecteplase in Patients with Wake-Up Branch Atheromatous Disease.Translational stroke research · 2026Article
- Pachymic Acid Targets PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway to Attenuate tPA-Induced Hemorrhagic Transformation After Ischemic Stroke.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhether TNK (tenecteplase) benefits patients with acute ischemic stroke treated within 4.5 to 24 hours remains uncertain, and no previous meta-analysis has differentiated between clinical settings where endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is unavailable or permitted, leading to pooled distinct clinical contexts and obscuring a clear estimation of TNK's net effect.
methodsWe searched for randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous TNK of 0.25 mg/kg with standard care or placebo in adults within 4.5 to 24 hours after acute ischemic stroke onset. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-1) at 90 days, with additional efficacy and safety end points. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed both overall and within predefined subgroups, stratified by whether EVT was permitted in individual studies (non-EVT versus EVT-permitted).
resultsFour multicenter randomized controlled trials enrolling 1278 patients were included. TNK significantly increased excellent functional outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.34 [95% CI, 1.06-1.71];
conclusionsTNK improves excellent functional outcomes and recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated within 4.5 to 24 hours, without increasing the risks of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or mortality. Notably, extended-window TNK provides greater additional benefits when EVT is inaccessible, establishing its role as an alternative reperfusion strategy in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.