ReviewKorean journal of radiology2025
Real-World Monitoring of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Challenges and Best Practices.
Review in Korean journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Derived CT Fractional Flow Reserve: Implementation Challenges Beyond Accuracy in Resource-Constrained Healthcare Systems.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- From Bench to Bedside: The Path Toward Real-World Translation for Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer Detection.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Radiology Research and Publishing Across 2025-2026: Perspectives FromKorean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Federated artificial intelligence monitoring service (FAMOS): an in silico feasibility study.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into radiology has the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, streamline workflows, and improve patient outcomes. However, successful real-world adoption hinges on robust systems for ongoing monitoring to maintain safety, efficacy, and compliance with regulatory standards. This article delves into the critical need for such monitoring in radiology, examining current regulatory frameworks and proposing actionable strategies for overseeing technical performance, algorithm reliability, and human-AI interactions. Key topics include methods for aligning imaging studies with appropriate AI tools, addressing challenges related to data transmission and processing delays, and evaluating approaches to algorithm performance monitoring, ranging from vendor-based and specialized systems to in-house solutions. The potential of using large language models to help algorithm monitoring is also highlighted as a promising avenue. Additionally, the article explores human-AI interaction challenges, such as automation bias (the tendency of users to overly trust automated decisions), misuse, and underuse, offering strategies to mitigate these risks through structured protocols and ongoing education. By aligning regulatory requirements with practical implementation strategies, comprehensive AI monitoring can optimize diagnostic decision-making while ensuring patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.