ArticleNeurospine2025
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on School-Based Scoliosis Screening Program in South Korea.
Article in Neurospine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the trends in school-based scoliosis screening programs, with a focus on the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, including its effects on referral numbers and radiological profiles of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
methodsA total of 298,666 volunteer individuals participated in the school-based scoliosis screening program, classified into 2 groups; prepandemic group (between 2017 and 2019, n=201,160) and postpandemic group (between 2021 and 2023, n=97,506). The data included referral volumes, the prevalence rate of AIS, and trends in both referral patterns and the characteristics of the screened population.
resultsThe prevalence rate of AIS among the screened population was significantly higher in the postpandemic group (49.35%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.12-50.59) compared to the prepandemic group (41.47%; 95% CI, 40.71-42.24) (p<0.001). The postpandemic group also exhibited significantly younger age (p<0.001), lower body weight (p<0.001), earlier onset of menarche (p<0.001), and a larger Cobb angle in females (p<0.001) compared to the prepandemic group. Additionally, the proportion of individuals not recognizing their AIS was significantly higher in the postpandemic group (99.74%) compared to the prepandemic group (88.87%) (p<0.001).
conclusionLockdown for preventing COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected the school-based scoliosis screening program. While the overall prevalence of AIS remained stable, the detection rate in the screened population increased, accompanied by younger ages, earlier menarche, and higher Cobb angles (in females) following the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.