ArticleNeurospine2025
Endoscopic Endonasal Transnasopharyngeal Approach for Ventral Craniovertebral Junction Lesions: A Technical Note.
Article in Neurospine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- O-arm-assisted endoscopic endonasal decompression for medullary compression caused by a clival osteophyte: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLesions of the ventral craniovertebral junction are difficult to access owing to their deep location and proximity to critical neurovascular and pharyngeal structures. In this study, we aimed to describe the surgical technique and clinical outcomes of the endoscopic endonasal transnasopharyngeal approach for ventral craniovertebral junction lesions and highlight key considerations regarding approach selection, airway management, and occipitocervical stabilization.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 7 patients who underwent the endoscopic endonasal transnasopharyngeal approach for ventral craniovertebral junction lesions. The analysis included preoperative planning for surgical access, intraoperative technique, postoperative management, airway and nutritional strategies, and the need for occipitocervical fixation. One representative case is presented to illustrate key technical steps.
resultsOf the 7 patients, 6 had neoplastic lesions and 1 had basilar invagination. Despite a relatively large mean lesion size of 39.4 mm, subtotal or greater resection was achieved in 5 of the 6 tumor cases. Occipitocervical fixation was performed in 2 cases. Two patients underwent prophylactic tracheostomy because of anticipated airway compromise. Of the 5 orally intubated cases, 3 were extubated immediately and 2 by postoperative day 2. Oral feeding resumed by day 10 in 6 cases. No postoperative infections or cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred. One patient experienced transient velopharyngeal insufficiency, which resolved spontaneously.
conclusionThe endoscopic endonasal transnasopharyngeal approach is a safe and effective option for ventral craniovertebral junction lesions when appropriately selected. Careful preoperative evaluation and individualized management of airway and spinal stability are essential for favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.