Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41077972›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2025

Atlantoaxial Reconstruction: The Artful Evolution of Craniovertebral Junctional Spine Surgery.

Sang Hoon Hwang, Seung Jun Ryu, Min Han Kim, Jong Koo Lee, Sun Woo Jang, Danbi Park, Chong Man Kim, Jin Hoon Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sang Hoon HwangDepartment of Neurosurgery Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Jun RyuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Daejeon Eulji University Hospital, Eulji University Medical School, Daejeon, Korea.
Min Han KimDepartment of Neurosurgery Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jong Koo LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sun Woo JangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea.
Danbi ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chong Man KimDepartment of Industrial and Management Engineering, Myongji University, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Hoon ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The atlantoaxial (C1-2) junction is among the most technically demanding regions for cervical spine surgery owing to its complex osseoligamentous anatomy and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Numerous posterior fixation constructs have been developed to optimize biomechanical rigidity and promote arthrodesis. Since Gallie's introduction of posterior wiring with autologous bone grafts in 1939, evolving techniques have focused on enhancing fusion rates while minimizing risk to adjacent structures. This paper outlines the historical evolution of C1-2 posterior instrumentation, current fixation strategies, bone fusion techniques, and reduction methods. A systematic literature search identified 61 relevant studies on C1-2 fusion. Additional references were manually reviewed to provide a comprehensive context. Of these, 41 studies were narratively summarized to outline the historical and conceptual evolution of C1-2 fusion techniques, while the remaining 20 post-2000 studies on contemporary surgical modifications were systematically reviewed and tabulated for technical details and clinical outcomes. C1-2 fusion techniques have evolved significantly over time. Early methods primarily involved posterior wiring with autologous bone grafts, but later transitioned to rigid segmental fixation using pedicle screw constructs, resulting in improved fusion rates and clinical outcomes. Interarticular fusion, when concurrently performed, enhances the biological fusion environment, contributing to favorable clinical results. C1 lateral mass, posterior arch, pedicle screws and C2 pedicle, lamina screws give us much stronger stability and higher fusion rates. Interarticular fusion using local bone also gives us technical easiness guaranteeing high fusion rate overcoming inconvenience of wiring and iliac bone harvest. Interarticular height reduction and interarticular fusion should be discriminated.

Indexed as

Atlantoaxial fusionAtlantoaxial reductionCraniovertebral junctionInterarticular fusionLateral mass screwPedicle screw

Identifiers

PMID41077972
PMCPMC12518907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.