ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2025
Protection of human rights during involuntary treatment in mental healthcare services: A European perspective.
Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Coercive measures in psychiatry: consensus and controversy in Swiss professional discourse.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Involuntary placement and treatment within mental healthcare represent one of the most sensitive areas where clinical needs and human rights intersect and the protection of fundamental rights of individuals subjected to coercive measures remains a paramount concern. This issue has been along-standing interest of the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), reflected in studies conducted by the EPA members and by the EPA Code of Ethics. Moreover, the EPA supports the work of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on a Draft Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, as an European document aiming to harmonize practice across Europe, emphasizing involuntary treatment as a last resort, guaranteeing access to legal counsel, and ensuring continuous monitoring. However, weemphasize several aspects that should be included: 1) future reforms must integrate legalsafeguards with innovations in community care and evidence-based practice, ensuring that involuntary measures remain exceptional and rigorously justified; 2) while evidence-based strategies to reduce coercive treatment exist, it is important to emphasize the need for regular staff training, knowledge exchange, and consistent application of high standards, with a focus on minimizing the use of involuntary treatment within facilities while developing alternatives; 3)coercive treatment is regularly used in general hospitals for patients lacking decision-making capacity. Addressing all involuntary treatment, in both psychiatric and other healthcare settings, to ensure that the same legal, ethical and clinical values and standards are applied to all, is also critical in order to confine coercion to the absolute minimum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.