Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41077908›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025

Covering All Bases: A Universal Metazoan UCE Probe Set to Democratize Phylogenomics.

Shahan Derkarabetian, Arianna Lord, Katherine Angier, Julia G Cosgrove, Ella Frigyik, Sara González-Delgado, Breanna Jordan, Paula C Rodríguez-Flores, Shoyo Sato, Lily Shapiro and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shahan DerkarabetianMuseum of Comparative Zoology & Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9163-9277
Arianna LordMuseum of Comparative Zoology & Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-2443-8799
Katherine AngierMuseum of Comparative Zoology & Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9501-3845
Julia G CosgroveMuseum of Comparative Zoology & Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2776-699X
Ella FrigyikMuseum of Comparative Zoology & Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9884-1419
Sara González-DelgadoDepartament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8715-7411
Breanna JordanMuseum of Comparative Zoology & Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-1834-5709
Paula C Rodríguez-FloresMuseum of Comparative Zoology & Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1555-9598
Shoyo SatoMuseum of Comparative Zoology & Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2970-8702
Lily ShapiroMuseum of Comparative Zoology & Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7267-2293
Gonzalo GiribetMuseum of Comparative Zoology & Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5467-8429

Funding

Harvard University's Faculty of Arts and SciencesMuseum of Comparative ZoologyNational Science Foundation 2154245Wetmore Colles Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biology is in a genomics era, but many researchers may still be alienated from these techniques as a lack of genomic resources remains for many animal groups, necessitating further democratization. Hybrid capture is a popular phylogenomic approach in molecular systematics, with ultraconserved elements being the most popular. However, access to ultraconserved element data is more expensive per sample relative to other commonly used genetic/genomic approaches. Using published genomes, we developed a metazoan ultraconserved element probe set, the universality of which allows multiple research groups working on vastly different animal lineages to share costs and resources across labs. We demonstrated the utility of this probe set both in silico against 58 published metazoan genomes and in vitro with 130 samples representing 33 metazoan phyla, showing that these probes target loci useful for both deep and shallow level relationships. The proportion of target ultraconserved elements sequenced by the Metazoa probe is equivalent to that of taxon-specific probe sets, but from across all animal phyla. We explored general patterns of ultraconserved element recovery across Metazoa using published genomes and the majority of publicly available ultraconserved element probe sets. The Metazoa probe set is available in three forms: the full set, containing 19,986 probes targeting 2,146 loci, a set containing 10,749 probes targeting 1,022 loci, and the reduced cost set, containing 5,098 probes targeting 466 loci. The development of a universal ultraconserved element probe set should expand the use of genomic data to a much larger segment of the zoological community, with strong potential for broad applications in phylogenomics across all animal phyla.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceGenomicsPhylogenyAnimalsGenomeanimal phylogenyphylogenomicssystematicstarget capture

Identifiers

PMID41077908
PMCPMC12571155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.