ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Self-Navigated, Retrospective, Data-Consistent Motion Correction for MPnRAGE.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-Navigated, Retrospective, Data-Consistent Motion Correction for MPnRAGE.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo extend and automate a data-consistent, self-navigated motion-correction method for 3D radial T1-weighted imaging.
methodsThis method incorporated rigid-body motion effects into the forward model, solving for parameters that maximize consistency with the data. The method was tested on five datasets with a range of motion types and severities. A separate collection of datasets was used to study the effect that the method has on the test-retest reliability of cortical thickness estimates.
resultsImage quality was improved across a wide range of distinct motion types, including some cases that would have been unusable if left uncorrected. The error-based weighting scheme and the increased timing resolution afforded by the proposed method were especially useful in cases of extreme and rapid motions. Moreover, the method improved test-retest reliability of cortical thickness measures in pediatric subjects, decreasing the average coefficient of variation from
conclusionThis method was found to be effective when used on T1-weighted radial data, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The fine-scale timing resolution and error-based weighting afforded by this technique will likely provide only a small benefit, unless one is investigating motion-prone populations or is searching for a very small effect size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.