ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Mapping a reproducible water fraction and T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping a reproducible water fraction and TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Mapping heterogeneous region- and tissue-specific brain ageing patterns using quantitative MRI.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Pooling quantitative MRI data: A multi-protocol study of healthy subcortical aging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWater fraction (WF) estimation, a form of quantitative MRI mapping, is typically performed using the variable flip angle (VFA) approach. In this study, WF estimation was extended to include the magnetization prepared with 2 rapid gradient echoes (MP2RAGE) protocol. The two methods were compared to assess the consistency of WF values across both acquisition strategies.
methodsWF and T
resultsHigh agreement was observed between WF and T
conclusionThe findings support the use of WF alongside T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.