ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025
Early-career genetic counselors' professional identity formation through experiences with continuing education at a professional conference.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors That Influence Genetic Counselors' Professional Identity-A Qualitative Study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Early-career genetic counselors' professional identity formation through experiences with continuing education at a professional conference.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Genetic counselors' professional identity in North America: A scoping review.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research aimed to describe professional identity (PI) and professional identity formation (PIF) of early-career genetic counselors (GCs) attending a professional conference. PI is a sense of self within a professional community and includes interpersonal and intrapersonal characteristics that reflect shared values of the field. PI can be learned through modeling in settings like conferences where professionals assemble and are engaged in continuing education (CE). Using a particularistic case study methodology and a social learning theory frame, this study explored how PI is modeled and the experiences that contribute to feelings of belonging in the profession. Participants were newly certified GCs who attended the 2022 National Society of Genetic Counselors Annual Conference. Sixteen participants completed a reflective writing prompt and two semi-structured interviews. Inductive open coding and refinement of codes resulted in four primary collective themes. (1) Awareness of PI and PIF: All participants described elements of the collective identity of GCs, though most were unaware of the term "professional identity." (2) Modeling of PI and PIF: Elements of identity were modeled in CE sessions and social settings. Participants noted concordance and discordance with other GCs, including perceived discrepancies between early-career and experienced GCs on the value of diversity and inclusivity. (3) Conference experience: In-person and virtual conference formats differed in community-building, inclusion, accessibility, and socialization. (4) Factors/experiences influencing belonging: Sense of community, CE session content, affirmation from others, and personal identity or characteristics like appearance impacted feelings of belonging. Findings indicate early-career GCs have emerging awareness of PI, suggesting opportunities to integrate strategies that promote PIF and strengthen PI, including equitable social opportunities for in-person and virtual attendees. Early-career GCs described how others influence feelings of belonging, highlighting a role for all GCs in supporting PIF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.