ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Diagnostic Challenges in Sessile Serrated Lesions: Progression to Adenocarcinoma in a High-Risk Patient.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are precursors in approximately 20-30% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, often characterized by B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) mutations and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and follow the serrated neoplasia pathway. Histopathological differentiation between SSLs with dysplasia and conventional adenomas is diagnostically challenging because their visual and pathologic features often overlap. SSLs with dysplasia carry a high malignant potential and can progress rapidly to invasive carcinoma, underscoring the need for accurate classification and timely intervention. CASE REPORT A 78-year-old man with a history of acute myeloid leukemia (treated with bone marrow transplant), Barrett's esophagus, and ulcerative colitis in remission underwent colonoscopy, which identified an 11-mm polyp. It was resected piecemeal and initially reported as showing features of both a sessile serrated adenoma (SSA) and a tubular adenoma (TA). Given the mixed histology, a follow-up colonoscopy was performed 6 months later, revealing an invasive, moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma with mismatch repair deficiency (loss of MLH1 and PMS2) and a BRAF V600E mutation. Surgical resection confirmed stage III CRC with lymph node involvement. Retrospective pathological review reclassified the original lesion as an SSL with dysplasia (SSL-D). CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of SSLs, particularly when lesions are resected piecemeal. For accurate diagnosis and optimal patient management, it is essential that there is effective communication between pathologists and endoscopists about the morphological characteristics of the polyp, and the reading pathologists should communicate with endoscopists for any clarification. A multidisciplinary, collaborative approach is crucial for high-risk lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.