Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41077720›Full record

ArticleJournal of personality2026

When Need Fulfillment Motivates: The Role of Significance Gain and Self-Expansion in Collective Mobilization.

Tomasz Besta, Aleksandra Cupta, Jadwiga Cichoń, Patrycja Szuca, Anna N Gajda, Michał Jaśkiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tomasz BestaUniversity of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6209-3677
Aleksandra CuptaUniversity of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3537-8719
Jadwiga CichońUniversity of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Patrycja SzucaUniversity of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Anna N GajdaUniversity of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-6870
Michał JaśkiewiczUniversity of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4358-1071

Funding

National Science Centre 2021/43/B/HS6/00020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis research examined whether positive in-group experiences-specifically those fulfilling the need for significance and the need for self-expansion-predict intentions to engage in collective action. We also investigated whether these associations are stronger than those linked to negative emotions (e.g., significance loss), and whether they remain robust when controlling for known predictors of collective action.

methodData were collected across three correlational studies (total N > 950) conducted in Poland and the United States. The studies used diverse sampling strategies, including a field study, an online survey, and a representative U.S. SAMPLE: Participants reported on their motivations and intentions to support various causes, including LGBTQ+ rights and political campaigns.

resultsAcross all studies, significance gain and self-expansion were consistent positive predictors of normative, pro-ingroup collective action. These factors generally showed stronger associations with collective action intentions than negative emotions, including significance loss. The predictive effects of these needs remained significant even when controlling for prior engagement, political orientation, group identification, perceived group efficacy, and anger at injustice.

conclusionsFulfillment of psychological needs for significance and self-expansion plays a robust and independent role in motivating collective action, beyond the influence of commonly studied negative emotional drivers.

Indexed as

MotivationSocial IdentificationCollective EfficacyEmotionsFemaleGroup DynamicsHumansIntentionMalePolandSocial GroupUnited Statescollective actionfield studiesneed for significancepersonalityself‐expansion

Identifiers

PMID41077720
PMCPMC13359295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.