Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41077667›Full record

ReviewTranscription

Perspective: divergent mRNA transcription machinery in

Franziska Drews, Martin Simon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transcription. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Franziska DrewsMolecular Cell Biology and Microbiology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5172-6915
Martin SimonMolecular Cell Biology and Microbiology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0962-7788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proper regulation of transcription involves not only quantitative control of RNA dosage but also ensuring the correct biochemical properties of transcripts. In all eukaryotes, the epigenetic landscape and the dynamic composition of the RNA Polymerase II complex (PolII) interact to control the transcription of translatable mRNA. Decades of research have described dogmatic rules for model organisms, such as the distribution of individual chromatin marks along the transcription unit or the hierarchical phosphorylation pattern in the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest PolII subunit RPB1. Besides this canonical mRNA transcription, there are exceptions; on the one hand, not all genes in a species follow the dogma, and on the other hand, there are species that show general divergence from the models, both in the epigenomic landscape and in the genetically encoded PolII. In the recent literature, protists in particular have shifted their attention as they show considerable differences in chromatin structure and PolII complex composition. Here, we aim to enlighten the transcription machinery of the unicellular ciliate

Indexed as

ParameciumRNA, MessengerTranscription, GeneticChromatinRNA Polymerase IIChromatinRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IIepigenomicsmessenger RNAParameciumPolII complexTranscription

Identifiers

PMID41077667
PMCPMC12716044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.