ArticleEar and hearing
Electrophysiological Responses to Spectral Ripple Envelope Phase Inversion in 3-Month-Olds and Adults.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesA critical problem in the clinical management of infants is the limited methods available to assess whether hearing aids or cochlear implants are providing sufficient input for speech sound discrimination. Spectral ripple discrimination is one nonlinguistic, behavioral measure that has been shown to correlate with speech perception in both adults and children. Electrophysiological responses to spectral ripple stimuli have been proposed as a potentially clinically feasible tool. In this study, a behavioral spectral ripple envelope inversion discrimination paradigm was adapted to investigate whether an electrophysiological response can be obtained using electroencephalography (EEG) in infants. Specifically, we investigate whether the detection of envelope inversion via the acoustic change complex (ACC) would match previously reported behavioral discrimination of the same stimuli.
designSpectral ripple stimuli included two ripple densities selected based on prior behavioral results: 1 ripple-per-octave (RPO), which can be discriminated by both infants and adults, and 8 RPO, which was not discriminated by either age group. Stimuli were constructed from two concatenated 1-sec noise carriers, with the spectral envelope sinusoidally modulated at either 1 RPO or 8 RPO with 10 dB depth. To elicit an ACC, a spectral envelope inversion was imposed mid-stimulus at 1 sec for both RPOs. Adult and 3-month-old infant participants were presented with stimuli from both conditions while undergoing a 32-channel EEG recording.
resultsAt the group level, an ACC to the spectral envelope inversion was detected only in the 1 RPO stimulus condition but not the 8 RPO condition for both infant and adult groups. In contrast, an Onset response to the stimuli was detected in both conditions, demonstrating that the stimuli themselves were detected. In the 1 RPO condition, the ACC detection rate was 81% for individual infants and 73% for individual adults, while in the 8 RPO condition, an ACC was detected in one infant and no adult participants. Individual participant detection rates for the Onset response were 94% for infants and 100% for adults in both conditions.
conclusionsThese findings show a relationship between EEG ACC detection and previously reported behavioral discrimination abilities, with the ACC detected in the 1 RPO but not the 8 RPO condition. These results demonstrate the ACC's potential for infant discrimination threshold estimation because it was elicited by a suprathreshold acoustic change (1 RPO) but not a subthreshold acoustic change (8 RPO). Critically, both 1 RPO and 8 RPO stimuli contained an envelope inversion at 1 sec, suggesting the ACC could serve as an objective measure of stimulus discriminability in infants as young as 3 months. Future studies with more stimulus conditions to fully establish a threshold, online monitoring of responses to increase the success rate of infant testing, and comparison of testing infants awake versus asleep are needed to further develop this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.