Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Michele Di MuscianoDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3130-7270
Piero ZanniniBIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2466-4402
Riccardo TestolinBIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8916-7231
Francesco Maria SabatiniBIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7202-7697
Diletta SantovitoBIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-5339-0834
Borja Jiménez-AlfaroBiodiversity Research Institute, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6601-9597
Florian JansenFaculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0331-5185
Milan ChytrýDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8122-3075
Lorenzo RicciDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0411-2435
Emiliano AgrilloItalian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research - ISPRA, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2346-8346
Fabio AttorreDepartment of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7744-2195
Idoia BiurrunDepartment of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1454-0433
Gianmaria BonariDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5574-6067
Hans Henrik BruunDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0674-2577
Andraž ČarniJovan Hadži Institute of Biology, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8909-4298
Maria Laura CarranzaEnvixLab, Dip. Bioscience and Territory, University of Molise, Pesche, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5753-890X
Roberto Cazzolla GattiBIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5130-8492
Jürgen DenglerVegetation Ecology Research Group, Institut of Natural Resource Sciences (IUNR), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Wädenswil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3221-660X
Michele De SanctisDepartment of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7280-6199
Ilona KnollováDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4074-789X
Jonathan LenoirUMR CNRS 7058 Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés (EDYSAN), Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0638-9582
Jesper Erenskjold MoeslundDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8591-7149
Tomáš PeterkaDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5488-8365
Nataša PipenbaherFaculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-1494-0194
Duccio RocchiniBIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0087-0594
Eszter RuprechtHungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0122-6282
Solvita RūsiņaFaculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-9580-4110
Urban ŠilcInstitute of Biology, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts (ZRC SAZU), Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-3052-699X
Sonja ŠkornikFaculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-7385-5507
Milan ValachovičPlant Science and Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-5296-5240
Kiril VassilevDepartment of Plant and Fungal Diversity and Resources, Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-4376-5575
Wolfgang WillnerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1591-8386
Alessandro ChiarucciBIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1160-235X
Funding
Basque Government IT1487-22Czech Science Foundation 19-28491XGobierno del Principado de Asturias AYUD/2021/51261Italian Ministry of University and Research CN_00000033
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The Natura 2000 (N2K) network of protected areas is one of the main tools for area-based conservation in the European Union (EU), yet its role in preserving plant biodiversity requires better understanding. We examined data kept in the European Vegetation Archive from over 1.2 million vegetation plots and obtained over 14.2 million plant species occurrences. To test the N2K network's representativeness of plant species gamma diversity, we compared the number and percentage of native and conservation priority species in- and outside the N2K network throughout the EU and for individual countries, biogeographical regions, and combinations thereof. We then determined whether N2K sites hosted more species than sites outside the network with the species-area relationship. Overall, almost 90% of the native vascular plant species occurred at least once in the N2K network. Yet, significant variation exists across countries and biogeographical regions-from 0% of species in the Boreal region of Lithuania, to 98% in the Alpine region of Croatia-indicating that local N2K sites are not equally representative of the regional gamma diversity. Nonetheless, the N2K network contains more species than land outside the network when area is taken into account. The planned expansion of the N2K network, as mandated by the European Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, should prioritize areas with currently underrepresented elements of the EU vascular flora.
Indexed as
BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesPlantsEuropean Unionanálisis de brechasarea‐based conservationconservación basada en el áreaDirectiva Hábitatsdiversidad vegetalgap analysisHabitats DirectiveNatura 2000Natura 2000, 植物多样性plant diversity基于区域的保护《栖息地指令》空缺分析
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Representativeness of the Natura 2000 network for preserving plant biodiversity in the European Union. · full record | OpenQuestion