Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41077636›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026

Using posterior probability informed thresholds to develop best practice recommendations for MorphoPASSE using the innominate, cranial, and combined traits.

Kate M Lesciotto, Alexandra R Klales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kate M LesciottoUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Alexandra R KlalesWashburn University, Topeka, Kansas, USA.

Funding

National Institute of Justice DOJ-NIJ-22-RO-0007National Science Foundation 2214747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MorphoPASSE is a free program that estimates sex based on morphological traits of the innominate, cranium, or a combined set of traits; however, MorphoPASSE does not provide recommendations on which set of traits performs best or recommend a posterior probability (PP) threshold for sex classification in modern forensic casework. The goals of this study were to compare accuracy rates when using different sets of traits and when imposing posterior probability informed thresholds (PPITs). Innominate and cranial trait score data were collected from four modern US documented skeletal collections (n = 285). Accuracy rates for five mutually exclusive PP intervals were calculated, and PP intervals that were significantly different from chance were condensed into PPITs. Using a PPIT of 0.85-1.00 produced high accuracy rates of 97.3% for the innominate traits and 90.2% for the cranial traits. Using the combined set of innominate and cranial traits resulted in significantly higher accuracy (99.6%) with a lower PPIT of 0.75-1.00. Additionally, the combined trait model corrected all previous misclassifications by either producing a correct sex classification or leaving the individual unclassified for failing to reach the required PPIT. Therefore, when both elements are available, the combined set of traits is recommended with a 0.75-1.00 PPIT. Individuals with a PP falling between 0.75 and 1.00 should be reported as consistent with the male or female reference samples, while those falling below should be reported as "could not be estimated." Use of these recommendations will help standardize the use of MorphoPASSE and reporting sex estimation results.

Indexed as

Sex Determination by SkeletonSkullSoftwareAdultFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProbabilitybest practice recommendationscranial traitsforensic anthropologyinnominate traitsMorphoPASSEposterior probability informed thresholdssex estimation

Identifiers

PMID41077636
PMCPMC12766668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.