Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41077629›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026

Verbatim theater: A transformative approach for bringing research to life.

Janeane Dart, Gabrielle Brand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Janeane DartDepartment of Nutrition Dietetics and Food, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7563-0395
Gabrielle BrandSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6606-6721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional methods of research translation within the scientific and health professions community are typically quite narrow, often focusing on written textual outputs and conference presentations. Considering translation approaches for our research findings and 'who' and 'what' we are trying to influence is worthy of alternative approaches perhaps. We share an example of bringing research findings to life via a verbatim theater. Verbatim theater uses the exact words provided in interviews and is directly informed and constructed from people's lived experience and narratives. This article draws from the first author's doctoral study exploring professionalism and sociocultural factors in dietetic education. This included a large qualitative data set following interviews with n = 100 participants. We have shared our reflexivity in decision making around approaching translating research in this creative and more embodied way, highlighting key strengths, experiences and limitations of developing a verbatim theater and included an excerpt of the theater and the script. We have provided practical recommendations for qualitative researchers who are interested in considering more innovative arts-based approaches to research translation. We encourage researchers to be more creative in considering more embodied ways of research translation.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalHumansInterviews as TopicProfessionalismQualitative Researchadult educationhealth humanitiesprofessionalismresearch translation

Identifiers

PMID41077629
PMCPMC12998406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.