ArticleJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2025
Predictive radiomics based ensemble machine learning approach in CT lung nodule diagnosis.
Article in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A methodological framework for integrating generalisable deep learning and radiomics fusion model for early lung cancer detection across multi-centre imaging datasets.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules based on clinical and contrast-enhanced computed tomography data: a multicenter study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputed tomography imaging, a non-invasive tool, is used around the globe by medical professionals to identify and diagnose lung cancer; a lethal disease with high rates of occurrence and mortality globally. Radiomics extracted from medical images, including computed tomography, in tandem with machine learning frameworks has received considerable focus and research for lung nodule identification.This investigation can help out clinicians to reach radiomics-based better and quicker decision support system for treatments and early diagnosis. However, it is still foggy and unclear which radiomics feature(s) to use for the prediction of pulmonary nodule. Consequently, this work is offered with an endeavor to efficiently apply machine learning techniques and radiomics to classify CT pulmonary nodules.
methodsLung Image Data Consortium (LIDC), containing 1018 CT cancer cases, is put to use. The Wavelet Packet Transform is used in conjunction with geometrical features, gray level run length matrix, gray level co-occurrence method and gray level difference method techniques to extract radiomics. Two techniques, boosted and bagged ensemble classification trees, are employed to choose an apposite set of features. The categorization of nodules as malignant or benign is assessed by the utilization of cutting-edge machine learning models: Support Vector Machines, Boosted Classification Ensemble Tree, Decision Trees, Bagged Classification Ensemble Tree, RUSBoosted Ensemble Trees, Subspace Discriminant Ensemble and Subspace KNN Ensemble.
resultsThe findings reveal that the Ensemble Subspace KNN gives best AUROC (93.4%), accuracy (88.3%) and F1-score (85.2%) using BACET feature selection method. The best sensitivity is produced by FGSVM (97.1%). RUSBOCET gives best precision and specificity of 93.4% and 83.1% respectively.
conclusionLung Cancer remains the most common and deadly type of cancer. Early detection of lung lesions and nodules is crucial in the fight against lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate radiomics based on geometrical, texture, and Daubechies WPT texture features for quantitative CT image analysis. The LIDC database was used in this study. Geometrical features, texture features based on three statistical methodologies (GLCM, GLDM GLRLM) and Daubechies WPT texture features are retrieved from the nodules. Using the ensemble EFS, BOCET and BACET, pertinent features were identified. Lastly, various cutting-edge ML classifiers were used to classify LC as malignant or benign. The out-turn shows that, using BACET EFS, Ensemble Subspace KNN gives best AUROC (93.4%), accuracy (88.3%) and F1-score (85.2%). FGSVM yields the best sensitivity of 97.1%. RUSBOCET gives best precision and best specificity of 93.4% and 83.1% respectively. Therefore, the methodology can be applied with efficacy to the CT based PN classification. Thus, the result can assist medical professionals in making better decisions and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.