Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41077550›Full record

SynthesisOrthopaedic surgery2025

Effectiveness of Microscopic Tubular Discectomy for Improved Pain and Mobility in Far Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review.

Chamath Jagoda, Samantha Spanos, Timothy L Siu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chamath JagodaMacquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Samantha SpanosAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3734-3907
Timothy L SiuDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH) is a subtype of lumbar disc herniation marked by severe radicular and lower back pain, often accompanied by sensory and motor dysfunction. Microscopic tubular discectomy (MTD) is a contemporary minimally invasive approach for treating FLLDH, yet its superiority over conventional discectomy remains inconclusive. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of MTD in improving pain and mobility for FLLDH patients. A secondary aim was to assess the safety of MTD. Primary outcome measures were patient-reported pain, assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), patient-reported mobility, assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and scores on the Modified MacNab criteria clinical assessment. Secondary outcome measures were mean blood loss, operation duration, hospital stay, reherniation rate, reoperation rate, and any peri- or postoperative complications. MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched for empirical studies on MTD for FLLDH, reporting pain or mobility outcomes. Data extracted included study design, participant characteristics, pre- and postmean scores for pain and mobility, blood loss, operation time, hospitalization duration, reherniation rate, and complications. Articles were quality appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality appraisal tools. Of 271 articles identified, 15 were included. Preoperative leg pain scores ranged from 5.5 to 8.6, and postoperative scores ranged from 1.2 to 3.8. For lower back pain, preoperative scores ranged from 2.4 to 7.6, with postoperative scores from 1 to 4.8. Seven studies assessed mobility using the ODI, reporting significant improvements; pre-operative scores ranged from 30.6 to 56.7, and postoperative scores ranged from 5.5 to 30.3. Seven studies used the Modified MacNab criteria, reporting excellent outcomes in 18.2%-71% of patients, good in 23%-54.5%, fair in 0%-18.2%, and poor in 0%-18%. Mean blood loss ranged from 30 to 70 mL, mean operation times from 43 to 126 min, and average hospital stays were, on average, ≤ 4 days. Reherniation was minimal, and the reoperation rate was low. Complications were rare, primarily transient neuropraxic symptoms. This review comprehensively synthesized empirical research on the effectiveness and safety of MTD for treating FLLDH. Overall, the findings indicate that MTD can reduce pain and improve mobility in patients with FLLDH, but limited sample sizes, variable follow-up periods, and a lack of controlled studies constrain definitive conclusions about MTD's superiority over other discectomy techniques. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023443900.

Indexed as

DiskectomyIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMicrosurgeryHumansPain Measurementextra foraminal lumbar disc herniationfar lateral lumbar disc herniationmicrodiscectomymicroscopic tubular discectomyminimally invasive surgerysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41077550
PMCPMC12685468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.