ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2026
Machine learning prediction of conduct problems in children using the longitudinal ABCD study.
Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting psychopathology symptom trajectories using machine learning: a 33-year prospective study.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren with conduct problems are at elevated risk for negative psychosocial, educational, and behavioral outcomes. Identifying at-risk children can aid in providing timely intervention and prevention, ultimately improving their long-term outcomes. There is a need to develop screening tools to better identify at-risk children who may benefit from early intervention.
methodsData were collected from the longitudinal Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. Children completed a baseline visit at age 9-10, then returned annually for 3 years (n = 3,517). We used machine learning classifiers (logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, support vector machine, and random forest) to predict conduct problems (i.e., conduct disorder or oppositional defiant disorder) in children after 1, 2, and 3 years.
resultsThe best-performing model (the random forest classifier) predicted children at risk for conduct problems with an accuracy of 90% or greater (AUC = 0.98 at 1 year, AUC = 0.97 at 2 years, AUC = 0.97 at 3 years). A random forest classifier simplified to include only 10 features was able to predict conduct problems nearly as well (AUC = 0.97 at 1 year, AUC = 0.96 at 2 years, AUC = 0.97 at 3 years).
conclusionsUsing factors previously linked to conduct problems, we built machine learning models to identify predictors of conduct problems in children over a 3-year period. A small number of self-report features can be used to predict persistent conduct problems with 90% or greater specificity and sensitivity up to 3 years after initial assessment. This suggests that parent and child self-report data, along with machine learning, can identify children at risk for persistent conduct problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.