Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41077503›Full record

ReviewClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2026

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Incorporating Immunotherapy into Upfront Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Therapy.

Ajoy L Dias, Mark R Litzow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ajoy L DiasImmune Deficiency-Cellular Therapy Program, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Mark R LitzowDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: Litzow.mark@mayo.edu.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) over the past 2 decades with excellent outcomes in both adults and children particularly in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease setting where in general the treatment outcomes are dismal. Several immune therapies including monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T cell engagers, antibody-drug conjugates, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells have shown excellent outcomes and safety in this setting. Based on the observed high response rates and improved survival outcomes in patients with R/R ALL, immunotherapy is now being prospectively studied in the upfront setting with an aim to reduce treatment related toxicity and death with conventional chemotherapy. In this manuscript we discuss the various clinical trials that have shown excellent outcomes in the frontline setting and discuss how best to incorporate them in newly diagnosed, treatment naïve ALL patients either as monotherapy or in combination with cytotoxic agents.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaHumansBlinatumomabChemotherapy-freeChimeric antigen receptor therapy (CAR-T therapy)Inotuzumab ozogamicinTyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID41077503
PMCPMC12516082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.