SynthesisBone & joint open2025
A systematic review on bioactive glass as a treatment for limb osteomyelitis and infected nonunion.
Synthesis in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Conflict wounds and antimicrobial resistance: a systematic review on local antimicrobials to prevent infection after extremity open fracture.BMJ military health · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review on bioactive glass as a treatment for limb osteomyelitis and infected nonunion.Bone & joint open · 2025Pooled it
- Antimicrobial-laden PerOssal beads display in vitro inhibition and killing of extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria associated with conflict wounds in Ukraine.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
- Differential approach for the management of femoral post-traumatic combat-related osteomyelitis in the war in Ukraine: a clinical case series.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Osteomyelitis and infected nonunion cause devastating morbidity and are difficult to treat. Antimicrobial resistance further complicates musculoskeletal infection and is a significant global problem, including in low- and middle-income countries. Extensively drug-resistant bacteria and high rates of musculoskeletal infection have been identified during the Russian-Ukrainian war. Biomaterials with antimicrobial properties unrelated to antibiotics represent a potential solution. Bioactive glass, for example, has shown promise as a bone void filler. It binds to bone, stimulates bone formation, causes no harmful immune response, and has antimicrobial properties. This systematic review appraises the evidence for bioactive glass as a treatment for osteomyelitis and infected nonunion. Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed with research librarian guidance. Articles were screened and assessed for risk of bias by two blinded authors. No date limitations were used. Methodology was guided by the Cochrane Handbook and the PRISMA statement. Data were compiled and narratively synthesized. Results: We included 24 observational studies on 957 patients. Reported outcomes were heterogeneous, with patient-reported outcome measures available in only one study. Most studies were small and at considerable risk of bias. Studies supported bioactive glass use with high rates of bone healing and infection resolution. Comparative studies found non-inferiority with established treatments such as antibiotic-containing calcium sulphate and polymethylmethacrylate cement spacers. Few significant bioactive glass-related complications were reported. Conclusion: This review demonstrates the potential of bioactive glass as a treatment for osteomyelitis and infected nonunion. Widespread uptake over established treatments is likely to require further supporting evidence, such as high-quality randomized controlled trials, to understand the role of biomaterials in treating these challenging conditions. Future work should examine 3D-printed bioactive glass hybrids, which may have biomechanical advantages for large bone defects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.