ReviewGeroScience2026
Recent advances in treating age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy: Current therapies and emerging novel approaches.
Review in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanocarrier-Based Ocular Drug Delivery Systems for Retinal Diseases: Therapeutic Potential.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Factors associated with diabetic retinopathy: a cross-sectional study of 1477 patients across four cities in Anhui, China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of retinopathies is expected to increase globally as our population ages and diabetes becomes more prevalent. Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) are major causes of severe vision loss. These ophthalmological conditions are associated with neovascularization caused by excessive vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion. This review focuses on the milestones achieved during the last few decades in treating retinopathies, presents a meta-analysis of key human clinical trials, and finally describes various novel therapies, some of which could potentially eliminate the need for intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF in the future. According to data from clinical trials and everyday medical practice, treatments targeting VEGF are efficient; however, they can cause various systemic (such as stroke) and ocular adverse events. The most frequently experienced adverse reactions (such as endophthalmitis or retinal detachment) are related to the injection process itself. These complications warrant the efforts invested in developing novel approaches, including gene therapy-based products and inhibitors of VEGF receptors. We discuss here the strengths and drawbacks of gene therapy and highlight the potential of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as alternative anti-neovascularization agents. TKIs have recently been tested via numerous administration routes, including simple oral dosing of oral formulations in addition to intravitreal implants, which allow for a slow release, intravitreal depots, and suprachoroidal injections. All of which have shown different safety and efficacy profiles. We conclude that gene therapy products, especially TKIs, have the potential to become inhibitors of ocular neovascularization in the upcoming years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.