ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Clinical significance on switching CDK4/6 inhibitors among 13,284 patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent clinical trials have shown that switching to a combination therapy of a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) compared with ET monotherapy. Reports indicate that abemaciclib provides benefits regardless of the PIK3CA mutation status; however, its clinical benefits remain insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of switching CDK4/6i + ET in a large real-world cohort. Using a medical database, we identified 13,284 patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer who received CDK4/6i + ET between 2008 and 2022. Patients were categorized into five groups based on their first- and second-line therapy patterns. We compared the median time to discontinuation (TTD) among the groups. In patients who switched from one CDK4/6i + ET to another CDK4/6i + ET, the second-line TTD and total TTD of first- and second-line therapies (n = 542) were significantly longer than those in patients who switched from CDK4/6i + ET to ET monotherapy (n = 490) (the second-line TTD: 11.2 vs. 4.9 months, p < 0.01; total TTD: 25.1 vs. 20.5 months, p < 0.01). The order of palbociclib and abemaciclib administration did not significantly affect the second-line or total TTD in patients who switched from one CDK4/6i + ET to another CDK4/6i + ET. Switching from one CDK4/6i + ET to another CDK4/6i + ET resulted in a significantly longer TTD than switching to ET monotherapy. Considering the phase III clinical trial results of capivasertib, switching to CDK4/6i + ET is a viable therapeutic option regardless of the PIK3CA mutation status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.