Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41076587›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2025

Proactive vs Reactive Treatment of Hypotension During Surgery: The PRETREAT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Matthijs Kant, Wilton A van Klei, Markus W Hollmann, Eline S de Klerk, Luuk C Otterspoor, Marc G Besselink, Teus H Kappen, Denise P Veelo, PRETREAT study group

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthijs KantDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Wilton A van KleiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Markus W HollmannAmsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eline S de KlerkAmsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Luuk C OtterspoorDepartment of Cardiology and Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Marc G BesselinkCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Teus H KappenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Denise P VeeloAmsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
PRETREAT study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Intraoperative hypotension is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes, but whether a proactive strategy to prevent intraoperative hypotension improves outcomes is uncertain. Objective: To determine whether intraoperative blood pressure management stratified by risk of hypotension reduces postoperative functional disability compared with usual care in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized clinical trial, adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery at 2 tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands were enrolled from June 17, 2021, to February 7, 2024. The date of last follow-up was October 24, 2024. Intervention: Patients were randomized 1:1 to proactive blood pressure management with mean arterial pressure targets based on risk of intraoperative hypotension (low risk, ≥70 mm Hg; intermediate risk, ≥80; high risk, ≥90) or usual management at their anesthesiologist's discretion, generally aiming to avoid a mean arterial pressure of less than 65 mm Hg without higher predefined targets. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was functional disability at 6 months, assessed with the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0; scale range, 0-100; higher scores indicate more disability). A minimally clinically important difference of 5 points was prespecified. There were 23 secondary outcomes, including quality of life, complications, and mortality within 6 months. Results: The trial was stopped early for futility after 3247 of 5000 planned patients (median age, 59 years [IQR, 44-69]; 1738 female [53.5%]) were enrolled. A total of 677 patients (21%) were low risk; 1814 (56%), intermediate risk, and 756 (23%), high risk. Baseline median WHODAS scores were 12.5 [IQR, 4.2-29.2] in proactive group and 14.6 [IQR, 4.2-29.2] in standard group). At 6 months, mean (SD) WHODAS scores were 17.7 (20.1) in the proactive group and 18.2 (20.5) in the standard group (mean difference, -0.5; 95% credible interval, -1.9 to 0.9). There were no significant differences in any of the 23 secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Intraoperative blood pressure management with mean arterial pressure goals stratified by risk of hypotension did not improve functional disability at 6 months postoperatively compared with standard intraoperative blood pressure management. Trial Registration: Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (CCMO): NL-OMON55117.

Indexed as

HypotensionIntraoperative ComplicationsMonitoring, IntraoperativeAdultAgedBlood Pressure DeterminationDisability EvaluationElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID41076587
PMCPMC12516513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.