Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41076580›Full record

ArticleEcology2025

Marine resources alter tundra food web dynamics by subsidizing a terrestrial predator on the sea ice.

Sean M Johnson-Bice, Frank B Baldwin, Evan S Richardson, James D Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sean M Johnson-BiceDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7538-131X
Frank B BaldwinCanadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Evan S RichardsonWildlife Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
James D RothDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

Environment and Climate Change Canada, Parks CanadaIsdell Family FoundationNatural Resources Canada Polar Continental Shelf ProgramNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canadathe Churchill Northern Studies Centre (CNSC) Northern Research Fundthe Province of Manitoba, Earth Ranger Foundationthe University of Manitoba Fieldwork Support ProgramWildlife Media
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predator use of resource subsidies can strengthen top-down effects on prey when predators respond numerically to subsidies. Although allochthonous subsidies are generally transported along natural gradients, consumers can cross ecosystem boundaries to acquire subsidies, thereby linking disparate ecosystems. In coastal Arctic ecosystems, terrestrial predators like Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) cross into the marine environment (sea ice) during winter to access marine resources. Arctic foxes kill seal pups and scavenge seal carrion (often remains from polar bear Ursus maritimus kills), especially when rodent abundance is low. Terrestrial predator use of marine subsidies may strengthen the top-down control of tundra food webs, but this hypothesis remained untested. We evaluated tundra food web dynamics at the terrestrial-marine interface from an ecosystem-level perspective by assessing: (1) how winter environmental conditions affect rodent abundance and marine subsidy availability, (2) the response of the Arctic fox population to this seasonal food variability, and (3) the subsequent effects of Arctic foxes on Canada goose (Branta canadensis interior) reproduction. Arctic foxes responded numerically to rodent abundance, which was positively related to snow persistence. Arctic fox abundance was positively related to polar bear body condition metrics, which were used as a proxy for marine subsidy availability. Canada goose reproductive success, in turn, was negatively related to Arctic fox abundance. Long-term trends in goose reproduction and snow persistence also indicate an ongoing phenological mismatch between nesting initiation and spring onset. Our results reveal near-term apparent competition between rodents and geese through a shared predator, Arctic foxes, contrasting with prior studies evaluating rodent-goose-predator relationships. Moreover, we establish a link between tundra and sea ice food webs by demonstrating how seal availability can affect goose reproduction indirectly by increasing Arctic fox predation on goose nests via a population response of foxes to marine resources. These marine resources are often provisioned by polar bears, and with both Arctic foxes and polar bears undergoing long-term regional declines evidently driven by climate-related changes in prey abundance and availability, we contextualize our study within ongoing climate change and highlight the vulnerability of this likely widespread terrestrial-marine linkage in a warming Arctic.

Indexed as

Food ChainFoxesIce CoverPredatory BehaviorTundraAnimalsArctic Regionsallochthonous resourcesapparent competitionArctic foxCanada goosecarrion provisioningclimate changeindirect effectslemmingsphenological mismatchpolar bearpredator–prey dynamicsresource subsidy

Identifiers

PMID41076580
PMCPMC12515398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.