ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2025
Overlapping mechanisms of epidural spinal cord stimulation for pain control and movement recovery.
Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Transplantation: Engineering Neural Cell Therapies and Combination Strategies for Spinal Cord Repair.Brain sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) for pain control and movement recovery have developed under parallel conceptual frameworks. SCS for pain has traditionally targeted the dorsal columns, while SCS for movement recovery has targeted the large-diameter afferent fibers near the dorsal root entry zone. We review the evidence to support these parallel mechanistic frameworks and explore potential mechanistic overlap between the two fields. RECENT
findingsRecent advances in closed-loop stimulation for pain and dorsal root (DR) stimulation for movement recovery speak to the value of these parallel mechanistic models in each field. However, review of the devices, electrode placement, and stimulation parameters used in both fields reveals overlap in the doses of SCS considered effective in each. Furthermore, evidence from finite element modeling suggests overlapping recruitment of dorsal column and dorsal root fibers from both midline and lateral stimulation. SUMMARY: There is evidence to support overlapping mechanisms of SCS for pain and movement recovery. The implications of potential mechanistic overlap warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.