Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41076554›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

Comparative Efficacy of Remimazolam Versus Propofol in Meningioma Surgery with Scalp Nerve Block.

Ziyan Sun

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ziyan SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the advantages of remimazolam combined with selective scalp nerve block in patients undergoing craniotomy for meningioma. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 300 patients undergoing craniotomy for meningioma were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the control group (n=150, propofol + selective scalp nerve block) or the experimental group (n=150, remimazolam + selective scalp nerve block). Hemodynamic parameters, pain intensity, central nervous system-specific protein levels (S100-beta protein [S100-b]), inflammatory markers, and the incidence of adverse reactions were recorded and compared at multiple postoperative time points. RESULTS Visual analog scale scores, S100-ß levels, and levels of inflammatory factors - interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and C-reactive protein - were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group at 2, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively (all P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the experimental group (2.67%) than in the control group (13.33%) (P<0.05). Although systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate decreased after anesthesia induction in both groups, the experimental group exhibited more stable hemodynamic profiles (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Remimazolam combined with selective scalp nerve block enhances analgesia, reduces brain injury and inflammatory markers, lowers the incidence of adverse effects, and provides more stable intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing craniotomy for meningioma.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepinesMeningiomaNerve BlockPropofolAdultAgedBlood PressureCraniotomyFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMiddle AgedScalpTreatment OutcomeBenzodiazepinesPropofolremimazolam

Identifiers

PMID41076554
PMCPMC12529995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.