Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41076553›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of language & communication disorders

One Call Away: Bilingual Teleassessment for Preschool and Elementary Children: A Systematic Review.

Aleksandra Kappenberg, Ulla Licandro

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aleksandra KappenbergDepartment of Special Needs Education and Rehabilitation, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7916-2983
Ulla LicandroDepartment of Special Needs Education and Rehabilitation, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5990-5029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the growing need for language and communication assessments in both languages for bilingual children, there remains a shortage of bilingual speech and language therapists (SLTs). Teleassessment has emerged as a promising solution to address this gap, but there is a pressing need for a comprehensive understanding of its organisation, implementation and feasibility across children of different ages, language combinations and proficiency levels.

aimsThis systematic review aims to synthesise the current studies on bilingual language and communication teleassessment for preschool and elementary-aged children. Specifically, it focuses on the language skills assessed in teleassessments, the tools and technology used and the organisational and implementation factors associated with bilingual teleassessment.

methodsThe review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was performed across five electronic databases as follows: APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Education Source, Medline and Web of Science. Data from the selected studies were extracted and categorised, with study quality assessed using the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADS). MAIN CONTRIBUTION: A total of seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The review found that bilingual teleassessment typically focused on assessing productive and receptive vocabulary and grammar, using standardised tests adapted for remote administration. Most assessments were conducted in hybrid formats, combining both tele- and face-to-face elements. The results showed that language skills assessed via teleassessment were generally comparable to those assessed in face-to-face settings, indicating the feasibility of bilingual teleassessment. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: While bilingual teleassessment offers a promising approach to supporting bilingual children, its application should be approached with caution due to the limited number of studies and small sample sizes. Future research should prioritise the development of standardised guidelines for their implementation and the creation of targeted training and networking opportunities for bilingual SLTs. This will help enhance the quality and accessibility of bilingual teleassessment services. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS?: What is already known on this subject Telepractice has been studied for several decades, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, research on bilingual teleassessment for children with varying ages, language constellations and competencies remains limited. The variability in study objectives and target populations has made it challenging to identify optimal methods for organising bilingual teleassessment in both research and clinical practice. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study contributes to the existing literature by synthesising and critically evaluating research on bilingual teleassessment. It provides a comprehensive overview of the language and communication skills assessed, the tools and technologies used and the organisational, implementation and feasibility considerations in bilingual teleassessment. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Although research on bilingual teleassessment is still evolving, this review highlights several effective organisational methods, best practices and challenges. The findings suggest that, similar to monolingual teleassessment, bilingual teleassessment is generally comparable to face-to-face assessment. To further support evidence-based decision-making in bilingual teleassessment, future studies-both single-case and large-scale-along with further training and networking for bilingual and monolingual SLTs, are essential.

Indexed as

Language TherapyMultilingualismChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19HumansLanguage TestsTelemedicinebilingual assessmentbilingualismelementary childrenprimary childrenremote assessmentsystematic reviewteleassessmenttelepractice

Identifiers

PMID41076553
PMCPMC12515270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.