Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41076549›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2025

Predicting ICU Readmission in Patients With Cerebral Infarction: A Machine Learning Approach Using Neurophysiological and Clinical Data.

Hang Su, Xiaoyong Huang, Yunpao Xiao, Xiaoman Xu, Shuihong Yu, Qinghua Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hang SuDepartment of Cerebrovascular Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Xiaoyong HuangDepartment of Neurology, Beilun District Second People's Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Yunpao XiaoDepartment of Neurology, Beilun District Second People's Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Xiaoman XuNingbo University, Ningbo, China.
Shuihong YuDepartment of Neurology, Beilun District Second People's Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Qinghua CaoDepartment of Cerebrovascular Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate a machine learning (ML)-based predictive model for intensive care unit (ICU) readmission in patients with cerebral infarction using neurophysiological and clinical data from the MIMIC-IV database.

methodsA retrospective cohort of 3,348 patients diagnosed with cerebral infarction was identified from the MIMIC-IV database. Feature selection was conducted using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, followed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Various ML models, including Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors, LightGBM, Naïve Bayes, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and XGBoost, were developed and evaluated based on model performance metrics.

resultsThe logistic regression model achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.682 (95% CI: 0.630-0.733). Significant predictors of ICU readmission included peptic ulcer disease, glucocorticoid use, potassium levels, and red blood cell count.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that ML models can effectively predict ICU readmission in CI patients. Logistic regression provides a clinically interpretable approach for risk stratification.

Indexed as

Cerebral InfarctionIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningPatient ReadmissionAgedFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiescerebral infarctionmachine learningMIMIC‐IVpredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID41076549
PMCPMC12515107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.