Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41076494›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025

The Impact of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation Configuration on Hemodynamic Characteristics and Risks of Hemolysis.

Yifeng Xi, Yuan Li, Hongyu Wang, Xiaofei Wang, Jianchao Li, Bingyang Ji, Zengsheng Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yifeng XiKey Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology (Beihang University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Yuan LiKey Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology (Beihang University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Hongyu WangKey Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology (Beihang University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Xiaofei WangKey Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology (Beihang University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Jianchao LiBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Bingyang JiDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease Fuwai Hospital National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100083, China. jibingyang@fuwai.com.
Zengsheng ChenKey Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology (Beihang University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China. czsbme@buaa.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3716-3156

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation L241031Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 12372300Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China U23A20486the National Key R&D Program of China 2020YFC0862900the National Key R&D Program of China 2020YFC0862902the National Key R&D Program of China 2020YFC0862904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the impact of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) cannula configuration and ECMO blood flow on intravascular hemodynamic environment, oxygen saturation, hemolysis, and thrombotic risk under varying perfusion conditions.

methodsFour different VV-ECMO cannulation configurations (femoro-jugular double cannulation, femoro-femoral double cannulation, dual-lumen single bicaval cannulation, and dual-lumen single bicaval cannulation blocking the atrial connecting vessel) commonly used in clinical practice were modeled and analyzed under different ECMO flow support conditions using computational fluid dynamics method. Oxygen saturation and flow rate at the ECMO outlet were used to determine the recirculation fraction (RF). The red blood cell damage model was used to explore the hemolysis risk. A thrombosis model considering platelet activation and deposition was proposed to quantify platelet activation and thrombosis risk.

resultsDifferent cannula configurations and ECMO flowrates significantly affect the RF, proximal wall vascular injury, and hemolysis risk in VV-ECMO. At low ECMO flow rates (≤3 L/min), all cannula configurations exhibit reduced recirculation and blood injury, while oxygen saturation at the pulmonary artery outlet is lower. Higher ECMO flows increase recirculation and shear stress while enhancing oxygen delivery. The use of the dual-lumen cannula instead of two-cannula configuration can simultaneously minimize recirculation and blood vascular injury while achieving higher oxygen saturation in the pulmonary artery under the same ECMO flow rate condition. The effect of drainage cannula side-hole blockage on the surrounding hemodynamic environment differs significantly across cannulation configurations. Side-hole blockage of the drainage cannula had the greatest impact on femoro-jugular double cannulations, with less hemodynamic impact on other cannula configurations, especially in double-lumen cannulation. In femoro-jugular double cannulas, side-hole blockage leads to increased RF and decreased pulmonary oxygen saturation, resulting in reduced effective oxygen supply from ECMO, while it also reduces vessel wall shear stress and hemolysis risk.

conclusionFor VV-ECMO, the dual-lumen cannula configuration maintains lower recirculation and blood damage while ensuring adequate oxygen supply, outperforming two-cannula configurations. Among the two-cannula configurations, femoro-femoral cannulation yields the lowest recirculation but the highest shear-related injury. Pulmonary artery oxygen content is a more reliable indicator of VV-ECMO oxygenation capacity than RF. Notably, there exists a high risk of thrombosis in proximity to the drainage cannula, and the blockage of the drainage cannula increases the ECMO RF and decreases the oxygenation efficiency. These findings provide guidance for selecting and designing VV-ECMO cannula configurations.

Indexed as

CatheterizationExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHemodynamicsHemolysisModels, CardiovascularHumansThrombosisCannula configurationComputational fluid dynamicsHemolysis and thrombosis riskRecirculation fraction (RF)Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO)

Identifiers

PMID41076494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.