ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Two-center retrospective study comparing intramedullary and plate fixation for rib fractures on safety and cost-effectiveness.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis retrospective study aimed to compare the safety and cost-effectiveness of intramedullary fixation versus plate fixation in patients with rib fractures. Each technique was performed at a separate hospital center.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent surgical fixation for rib fractures from February 2021 to January 2024. Eligible patients had fractures meeting surgical criteria and were treated with either intramedullary or plate fixation. Intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, and costs were compared between the two groups.
resultsA total of 89 patients were included, with 45 receiving intramedullary fixation and 44 receiving plate fixation. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes-including operative time, hospital stay, drain removal, complications, healing rates, and pain scores-were comparable. Notably, intramedullary fixation was significantly less expensive than plate fixation.
conclusionIntramedullary fixation offers similar safety and efficacy to plate fixation for rib fractures while providing a clear cost advantage, suggesting potential economic benefits for healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41076490What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.