Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41076485›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

A systematic review of perinatal palliative care models: challenges and opportunities for the future.

Anna Zanin, Annalisa Salerno, Maria Elena Cavicchiolo, Chiara Daicampi, Beatrice Martini, Anna Marinetto, Sabrina Salvadori, Franca Benini

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna ZaninWomen, Children and Adolescent Department, HUG Children's Hospital, Hopitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland. anna.zanin@hug.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4210-8509
Annalisa SalernoPalliative Care and Pain Service, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6687-5879
Maria Elena CavicchioloNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9965-6549
Chiara DaicampiDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0008-9961
Beatrice MartiniNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Anna MarinettoPalliative Care and Pain Service, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5490-7761
Sabrina Salvadori *Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2704-8018
Franca Benini *Palliative Care and Pain Service, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8312-6976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perinatal palliative care (PnPC) is critical for improving the quality of life of infants with extreme prematurity and life-limiting conditions. However, its implementation differs significantly worldwide. This systematic review will assess and compare PnPC models in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to identify best practices, challenges, and areas for improvement. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL was conducted for studies published in the last decade describing PnPC delivery models. Data on study design, PnPC model characteristics, team composition, timing of involvement, and key outcomes were extracted and synthesized. Fourteen observational studies were included; no interventional trials were identified. The majority of studies originated from the USA (64%). Three primary PnPC delivery models were identified: consultative, integrative, and team-collaborative. Consultative models improved referral rates but were often associated with delays, whereas integrative and collaborative models provided more seamless, continuous care. Across all models, multidisciplinary teams were central to care delivery. Early integration of PnPC, particularly from the antenatal period, was associated with improved outcomes, including higher parental satisfaction, clearer goals of care, and reduced aggressive end-of-life interventions.

conclusionEarly, integrated PnPC delivered by a multidisciplinary team improves end-of-life care and family support in the NICU. However, significant heterogeneity in practice and a lack of high-level evidence persists. Future research should prioritize rigorous interventional designs, greater geographical diversity, and the use of standardized, family-centered outcome measures to establish evidence-based guidelines for neonatal palliative care. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Perinatal Palliative Care is a vital part of neonatology, prioritizing the quality of life for extremely preterm infants and those with life-limiting conditions. WHAT IS NEW: • The review revealed variability in perinatal palliative care models, timing and team compositions, suggesting early integration can improve support for babies, families and healthcare teams. • Future research should focus on rigorous interventional designs, geographic diversity, and long-term family centered outcomes. • Integrating practical clinical experience with theoretical education strengthens healthcare professionals' competencies and guidelines development.

Indexed as

Palliative CarePerinatal CareHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPatient Care TeamLife-limiting conditionLife-threatening conditionNeonatal palliative careNeonateNewbornPerinatal palliative care

Identifiers

PMID41076485
PMCPMC12515238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.