ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025
STR genotyping diagnosis of hydatidiform moles: an assessment of 2871 consecutive products of conceptions.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the incidence of hydatidiform moles in a tertiary care setting and examined the efficacy of short tandem repeat genotyping (STR) as a primary ancillary diagnostic tool for molar gestations. Consecutive products of conceptions undergoing genotyping were analyzed. A total of 2871 cases were analyzed, comprising 1693 in-house and 1178 consultation specimens. Patient ages ranged from 10 to 57 years (mean 32, median 33). Laser microdissection was performed in 138 specimens. STR genotyping yielded a definitive diagnosis in 99.5% of cases (2857/2871), classifying them as 282 complete moles (241 monospermic, 41 dispermic), 564 partial moles (546 dispermic, 12 monospermic, 6 triandric tetraploid), and 2006 non-molar gestations (including 125 trisomies, 24 digynic triploids, 4 egg donor conceptions, 1 trigynic tetraploid, 3 androgenetic/biparental mosaics, 2 chimeric twin gestations with a molar component of either monospermic complete mole or heterozygous partial mole, and 1 trigynic tetraploid). Among molar gestations, complete and partial moles accounted for 38.6% and 61.4% of in-house cases and 28.2% and 72.0% of consultation cases, respectively. Notably, complete moles occurred exclusively in patients younger than 15 or older than 50. The mean turnaround time for STR genotyping was 5.3 days overall (5.7 days for in-house and 4.8 days for consultation cases). Hydatidiform moles accounted for 29.4% of the study cohort in our tertiary care setting, with partial hydatidiform moles comprising two-thirds of these cases. With an average turnaround time of 5.3 days and a 99.5% success rate, STR genotyping demonstrated high efficiency in the accurate diagnosis and classification of hydatidiform moles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41076484What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.