Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41076471›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Predictive value of artificial intelligence-based quantitative CT feature analysis for diagnosing the pathological types of pulmonary nodules.

Haoyuan Zhang, Kun Liu, Yadong Ding, Hanbo Li, Jing Liang, Hongming Yu, Kejie Yin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haoyuan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Mengcheng County No.1 People's Hospital, Mengcheng, China.
Kun LiuDepartment of Radiology, Mengcheng County No.1 People's Hospital, Mengcheng, China.
Yadong DingDepartment of Radiology, Mengcheng County No.1 People's Hospital, Mengcheng, China.
Hanbo LiDepartment of Radiology, Mengcheng County No.1 People's Hospital, Mengcheng, China.
Jing LiangDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. liangjingxyz@163.com.
Hongming YuDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. yhm239x@126.com.
Kejie YinDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. kejieyin@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9723-5132

Funding

Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital NoCZXM2022106Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Nos.XJSFZJJ202026National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAccurate preoperative classification of pulmonary nodules (PNs) is critical for guiding clinical decision-making and preventing overtreatment. This study aims to evaluate the predictive performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-based quantitative computed tomography (CT) feature analysis in differentiating among four pathological types of PNs: atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ (AAH + AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC), and lung inflammatory nodules (IN). MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 462 pathologically confirmed PNs were analyzed. Radiomic features, including CT attenuation metrics, 3D morphometrics, and texture parameters such as entropy and skewness, were extracted using a deep learning-based AI platform. Logistic regression models were constructed using both single- and multi-variable strategies to evaluate the classification accuracy of these features. Moreover, the inclusion of IN as a separate category significantly enhanced the clinical utility of AI in differentiating benign mimickers from malignant nodules. The combined model, which integrated AI-derived features with traditional CT signs, was used to assess the diagnostic performance of the radiomic features in differentiating the four pathological types of nodules.

resultsThe combined model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.936 for IAC, 0.884 for AAH + AIS, and 0.865 for IN. Although MIA showed lower classification accuracy (AUC = 0.707), key features such as entropy, solid component ratio, and total volume effectively distinguished invasive from non-invasive lesions.

conclusionThese findings highlight the potential of AI-enhanced radiomics for supporting non-invasive, objective, and individualized diagnosis of PNs. KEY POINTS: Question Can artificial intelligence (AI)-based quantitative CT analysis reliably differentiate benign inflammatory nodules from the spectrum of lung adenocarcinoma subtypes, a common diagnostic challenge? Findings An integrated model combining AI-driven radiomic features and traditional CT signs demonstrated high accuracy in differentiating invasive adenocarcinoma (AUC = 0.936), pre-invasive lesions (AUC = 0.884), and inflammatory nodules (AUC = 0.865). Clinical relevance AI-enhanced radiomics provides a non-invasive, objective tool to improve preoperative risk stratification of pulmonary nodules, potentially guiding personalized management and reducing unnecessary surgeries for benign inflammatory lesions that mimic malignancy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceDiagnosis, DifferentialRadiomicsSolitary pulmonary nodule

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.