ReviewEye (London, England)2025
Novel targets beyond vascular endothelial growth factor-A inhibition: improving vision with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treatment.
Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary goal in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is to optimise visual acuity outcomes for patients. Landmark clinical trials have demonstrated improved visual outcomes with standard-of-care vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, principally targeting a single ligand (VEGF-A). However, in the real-world setting, not all patients attain optimal visual outcomes with these monotherapies. The role of the VEGF-A and VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-2 axis in angiogenesis and vascular permeability is well characterised, but other VEGF family members, including VEGF-C and VEGF-D, which activate VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3, have also been implicated in nAMD pathogenesis. This may explain the heterogeneous responses observed with current therapies that primarily inhibit VEGF-A signalling, and in patients who continue to lose vision despite treatment, the consequences can be profound. Vision loss affects daily living and can lead to increased cost of care and susceptibility to falls and injuries. This review will explore the VEGF family of ligands and receptors and their role in nAMD, as well as novel therapeutics in development that target mediators beyond VEGF-A with the potential to provide improved vision benefits to patients. In particular, sozinibercept, an investigational trap biologic inhibitor of VEGF-C and VEGF-D ligands, has shown promising efficacy with superior vision gains when used in combination with ranibizumab dosed monthly (standard-of-care therapy) vs. standard-of-care alone (i.e. monthly ranibizumab). This adds to the increasing evidence that multifaceted approaches that target the VEGF family beyond VEGF-A have the potential to provide better vision outcomes for patients with nAMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.