Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41076411›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of anaesthesia2025

Effect of neuromuscular blocking agents on tracheal intubation quality in paediatric patients: a systematic review using network meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Luc E Vanlinthout, Jacques J Driessen, Robert Jan Stolker, Emmanuel M Lesaffre, Johan M Berghmans, Lonneke M Staals

Abstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical Use of Endotracheal Intubation Without Neuromuscular Blockade: The Current Stage of Knowledge.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luc E VanlinthoutDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: l.vanlinhout@erasmusmc.nl.
Jacques J DriessenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert Jan StolkerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Emmanuel M LesaffreInteruniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Johan M BerghmansDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Lonneke M StaalsDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis meta-analysis is the first to compare tracheal intubation conditions and haemodynamic responses produced by various types and doses of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in paediatric anaesthesia while also exploring factors associated with variability in outcomes.

methodsRandomised controlled and controlled clinical trials involving healthy paediatric participants (0-12 yr) were included. Trials compared intubation conditions using various NMBA interventions or NMBA-free settings under direct laryngoscopy. Outcomes included odds ratios (ORs) for excellent and acceptable intubation conditions, and mean differences for MAP and HR. Bayesian network, pairwise, and cumulative meta-analyses, along with meta-regression, assessed NMBA effectiveness and covariate effects.

resultsData from 105 trials (8008 participants) were analysed. Suxamethonium ≥1.50 mg kg

conclusionsWe present a meta-analytical approach to synthesise and consolidate evidence from previous research and demonstrate how neuromuscular blocking agent type and dose, intubation timing, age, and induction drugs affect the safety and efficacy of paediatric airway management. Low-to-moderate confidence can be assigned to the recommendations from this meta-analysis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42018097146).

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicNeuromuscular Blocking Agentsage-specific effectscomparative efficacydrug interactionshaemodynamic responsesnetwork meta-analysisneuromuscular blocking agentspaediatric patients (0–12 yr)tracheal intubation

Identifiers

PMID41076411
PMCPMC12799451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.