ArticleContemporary clinical trials2025
A pragmatic pre-post intervention trial to address adherence to lung cancer screening follow-up in community settings (the ACCELL trial): Study protocol.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06324110 (Evaluating Centralizing Interventions to Address Low Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening Follow-Up in Decentralized Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating Centralizing Interventions to Address Low Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening Follow-Up in Decentralized Settings (The ACCELL Interventional Trial)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung cancer screening care pathways in community settings: an examination of 3 healthcare systems.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2026Article
- Reframing computed tomography-associated cancer concerns in lifesaving screening: keeping the focus on lives saved.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- Beyond centralization: what community lung cancer screening workflows could reveal about the components that matter.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose chest CT (LDCT) can prevent lung cancer deaths in high-risk individuals; However, these benefits are tempered by low adherence to annual screening and low rates of follow-up for those with abnormal findings.
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of centralized approaches to care coordination on LCS follow-up in community settings through a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial.
methodsThis is a pre-post intervention trial of a pragmatic and flexible approach to LCS care coordination delivered at the system-level at two community LCS programs based at regional hospitals in Washington state. Care coordination approaches include standardized LCS follow-up workflows incorporating universal tracking of LCS results, universal results delivery to patients, stepped approaches to follow-up reminders and personalized approaches to positive findings. Participants who are eligible for and undergo LCS during either period (n ∼ 6750) will be included. Primary outcomes include adjusted changes in screening adherence to annual follow-up and follow-up for positive findings between the pre- (August 2022-March 2025) and post- (March 2025-September 2027) intervention period. Secondary outcomes include assessing the impact of interventions by community site, patient ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and rurality. We will also assess the implementation of the intervention with attention to adaptation, sustainability and equity. DISCUSSION: Implementing centralizing care coordination models may decrease barriers and improve adherence to LCS in community settings and serve as a model to improve LCS follow-up in clinical care settings. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06324110.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.